I took the 4-day intensive here in Chapel Hill, and I think I've finally recovered enough to write about it! 40-ish hours of taiji in 4 days is a lot.
San shou is apparently not taught very widely. There was a single book published in 1932, which seems to be the main source. It's derived from a Yang family style, an older one, so the applications are somewhat different than they look today.
I've heard the history twice, but I can't manage to recall it perfectly. This article sounds kind of like the one I was taught. (Disclaimer: the site linked is not my school, etc.) ETA: This blog post talks a bit about Hsiung Yang-Ho/Xiong Yang-He (Wade Giles makes my head hurt), who taught my teacher's teacher (he believes.) Master Jou never talked about his teachers, apparently. (Google "hsiung yang ho" has many links.) /ETA
San shou as I was taught is two solo forms that are matched, side A and side B. I learned side B, and I might learn side A eventually. (Probably. Once I have the hang of B.) Matching is very different than solo form, because you have to be aware of another body in your space and adjust to match it. (Also, keep your frame solid so you maintain appropriate spacing.)
For me, the most useful aspects of san shou are three. First, it makes me see where I'm being lazy in my solo form. Drooping arms, shortened stances, no intention. Second, the applications are helpful in seeing why this posture, what that posture is for. It's part of my learning style, so that sort of knowledge is useful for me. Third, it forces me to think about proper weight shifting and movement from the dantien. This ties in to number one, but it's a separate idea from laziness. I've never been a conscious learner; I don't really think about information at a conceptual level. But to do san shou well, I need to think consciously about movements.
If you get a chance, I would recommend taking a san shou class. I can't vouch for other schools' or instructors' programs, but the Magic Tortoise School's is quite good. If you can swing the travel expense and the class fee, it's likely to be worth your effort. (Alternatively, Dr Jay and Kathleen have traveled to other locations to teach, so if you can get enough interest in your area, you can contact them through their website.)
Master Jou Tsung-hwa said that studying tai chi without learning san shou is like buying shoes and taking home only the box. I can see that.
San shou is apparently not taught very widely. There was a single book published in 1932, which seems to be the main source. It's derived from a Yang family style, an older one, so the applications are somewhat different than they look today.
I've heard the history twice, but I can't manage to recall it perfectly. This article sounds kind of like the one I was taught. (Disclaimer: the site linked is not my school, etc.) ETA: This blog post talks a bit about Hsiung Yang-Ho/Xiong Yang-He (Wade Giles makes my head hurt), who taught my teacher's teacher (he believes.) Master Jou never talked about his teachers, apparently. (Google "hsiung yang ho" has many links.) /ETA
San shou as I was taught is two solo forms that are matched, side A and side B. I learned side B, and I might learn side A eventually. (Probably. Once I have the hang of B.) Matching is very different than solo form, because you have to be aware of another body in your space and adjust to match it. (Also, keep your frame solid so you maintain appropriate spacing.)
For me, the most useful aspects of san shou are three. First, it makes me see where I'm being lazy in my solo form. Drooping arms, shortened stances, no intention. Second, the applications are helpful in seeing why this posture, what that posture is for. It's part of my learning style, so that sort of knowledge is useful for me. Third, it forces me to think about proper weight shifting and movement from the dantien. This ties in to number one, but it's a separate idea from laziness. I've never been a conscious learner; I don't really think about information at a conceptual level. But to do san shou well, I need to think consciously about movements.
If you get a chance, I would recommend taking a san shou class. I can't vouch for other schools' or instructors' programs, but the Magic Tortoise School's is quite good. If you can swing the travel expense and the class fee, it's likely to be worth your effort. (Alternatively, Dr Jay and Kathleen have traveled to other locations to teach, so if you can get enough interest in your area, you can contact them through their website.)
Master Jou Tsung-hwa said that studying tai chi without learning san shou is like buying shoes and taking home only the box. I can see that.
Tags: